The Spectre Haunting Europe :
Debt Defaults, Austerity, and Death of the “Social Europe” Model
Debt Defaults, Austerity, and Death of the “Social Europe” Model
A spectre is haunting Europe: the illusion that Latvia’s financial and fiscal austerity is a model for other countries to emulate. Bankers and the financial press are asking governments from Greece to Ireland and now Spain as well: “Why can’t you be like Latvia and sacrifice your economy to pay the debts that you ran up during the financial bubble?” The answer is, they can’t – without an economic, demographic and political collapse that will only make matters worse.
(... l'article mérite vraiment le déplacement ...)
The EU’s creditor nations and banks are seeking to resolve the crisis  in way that will not cost them much money. The best hope, it is argued,  given the inability of the crisis countries to depreciate their  currencies, is “internal devaluation” (wage austerity) on the Latvian  model. Bankers and bondholders are to be paid out of EU/IMF bailout  loans.
         
The problem is the austerity imposed by existing debt levels. If  wages (and hence, prices) decline, the debt burden (already high by  historical standards) will become even heavier. This is what the United  States suffered in the late 19th century, when the price level was  driven down to “restore” gold to its pre-Civil War (and hence,  pre-greenback) price. Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan  decried crucifying labor on a cross of gold in 1896. It was the problem  that England earlier experienced after the Treaty of Ghent ended the  Napoleonic Wars in 1815. Aside from the misery and human tragedies that  will multiply in its wake, fiscal and wage austerity is economically  self-destructive. It will create a downward demand spiral pulling the EU  as a whole into recession.
The basic problem is whether it is desirable for economies to sacrifice  their growth and impose depression – and lower living standards – to  benefit creditors. Rarely in history has this been the case – except in a  context of intensifying class warfare. So what will Latvians, Greeks,  Irish, Spaniards and other Europeans do as their labor is crucified by  “internal devaluation” to shift purchasing power to pay foreign  creditors?
What is needed is a reset button on the EU’s economic and fiscal  philosophy. How Europe handles this crisis may determine whether its  history follows the peaceful path of mutual gain and prosperity that  economics textbooks envision, or the downward spiral of austerity that  has made IMF planners so unpopular in debtor economies. 
Is this the path that Europe will embark on? Is it the fate of the  Jacques Delors’ project of a Social Europe? Was it what Europe’s  citizens expected when they adopted the euro? 
There is an alternative, of course. It is for creditors at the top of  the economic pyramid to take a loss. That would restore the  intensifying GINI income and wealth coefficients back to their lower  levels of a decade or two ago. Failure to do this would lock in a new  kind of international financial class extracting tribute much like  Europe’s Viking invaders did a thousand years ago in seizing its land  and imposing tribute in the form of land. Today, they impose financial  charges as a post-modern neoserfdom that threatens to return Europe to  its pre-modern state.
 

 
 



